Mr . Justice Stewart on the Court of Appeals
نویسنده
چکیده
I T HE NAMING of a new justice to the Supreme Court quite properly interests the country at large as well as the profession. What, we always want to know, has he said or done in the past? What, the reporters always ask, is his "judicial philosophy"P In the case of Mr. Justice Stewart, we perhaps ought to eschew the latter inquiry because he himself has told us: "I really don't know what it is."' It may be useful, however, even though we can answer the question no more positively than the new appointee, to look briefly at some aspects of his career on the Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit, on which he served for over four years immediately prior to his appointment. But first, the scanty vital statistics should be noted. Stewart's path is the well-worn one leading from Cincinnati to Yale College and Yale Law School, where he was graduated in 1941. As an undergraduate, he served as chairman of the Yale Daily News, and in law school, was the comment editor of the Yale Law Journal. After seeing duty with the Navy during the war, he finally landed back in Cincinnati for a period of practice before his initial judicial appointment in 1954.2 Of his intellectual comings and goings in this period, one knows little. As an undergraduate, Stewart announced for the Yale Daily News: "Because we believe wholeheartedly in the philosophy of the
منابع مشابه
Theoretical approach of the main means of appeals in the European procedural law.
Knowledge and understanding the means of appeals lodged before the courts of the European Union, limited only to the points of law, are very important taking into account the modality to control a judgment delivered by an inferior court exists since ancient times, being governed among others, by the Larin principle: res judicata pro veritate accipitur. In the following we will examine, in gener...
متن کاملPregnancy Discrimination in the Wake of Young v. Ups
Introduction ................................................................................................................................................... 133 I. Pregnancy Discrimination Act of 1978 ..................................................................................................... 136 A. Pregnancy Discrimination Pre-PDA .....................................................
متن کاملJustice on the Fly: The Danger of Errant Deportations
The government may deport an immigrant appealing a deportation order in federal court even before the court rules on the case, unless the court issues a stay of removal. In its 2009 decision in Nken v. Holder, the Supreme Court clarified that the legal standard for stays of removal is the same test courts use for preliminary injunctions. Yet Justice Kennedy expressed frustration that the Court ...
متن کاملA Federal Appellate System for the Twenty-First Century
In December 1998, the Commission on Structural Alternatives for the Federal Courts of Appeals issued a report and recommendations for Congress and the President. The commission resulted from ongoing controversy over splitting the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit The commissioners clearly suggested that the circuit remain intact but proposed three regionally based adjudicative divisio...
متن کاملExecutive Order on Immigration: Information and Resources
Courts (Maryland and Hawai'i) temporarily prevent the Government from enforcing the “travel ban” imposed by Executive Order 13780 [11]. The Government appealed both the Maryland and Hawai'i orders. On May 25, 2017, the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals upheld [12] the Maryland District Court's preliminary injunction, meaning that the Executive Order travel ban will continue to be blocked for now....
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
عنوان ژورنال:
دوره شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2015